Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

CSB #7: Goodbye, Communication

While Alzheimer's Disease is probably one of the best-known forms of dementia, there are many equally bad types that are not as prevalent. One of these is primary progressive aphasia, which affects the brain's language center. Aphasia is a "loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage," according to the dictionary on my dashboard. While PPA is often mistaken for Alzheimer's, it is clearly different in several ways. First, it chiefly affects the brain's language center and only attacks memory after some time. Also, in Alzheimer's, the patient him/herself cannot recognize that he/she is affected by the disease, and it is often family members to identify the symptoms. However, those with PPA usually detect a deterioration in their ability to communicate before people around them sense a difference. Some similarities are that it shortens lifespan (most patients live to 67) and is a from of dementia. Sadly, frequent misdiagnoses of the disease result in incorrect treatment, which sets back the fight a long way. According to Dr. Duffy, head of speech pathology in Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, "early intervention is important."



















With the language-harming effects of the condition come an even worse symptom: the deterioration of communication. The wife of patient Steve Riedner compares it to raising a child again. Riedner can "open the car window, then not know how to close it," and even recommended forms of communication like the iPad, which has apps that can talk for a person, were no help in his advanced stage of PPA. Even sign language does not work, as it utilizes the same area of the brain.

In terms of treatment, there is nothing that can even begin to revert the process of language-center failure. However, treatment usually focuses on saving the stronger parts of the person's communication and leaving the weaker elements behind. As I mentioned earlier, computers, picture icons, and iPad apps are recommended as alternate forms of communication. Dr. Mesulam, the first person to recognize the disease in today's world, says that it affects "word-finding, object naming, syntax, phonology, morphology, spelling, or word comprehension." He goes on to say that the disease comes gradually, over years.
Note: Some definitions to clarify, all from my dashboard dictionary.
Syntax: the arrangement of words to create well-formed sentences in a language
Phonology: the branch of linguistics that deals with systems of sounds in a particular language
Morphology: in linguistics, the study of the form of words

My thoughts: this is truly a terrible disease, and even more unfortunate is that it is not recognized and valuable time is wasted on unnecessary forms of treatment. It would completely terrifying, as the affected person, to realize that you could not speak with the coordination of old, that the numbers started to look like a jumble on the page, that your own notes began to read like gobbledegook. Another awful aspect is that communication itself is difficult, and after the early stages of PPA, cannot even be achieved by some patients. One aspect that was surprising to me was that it was not seen to be a new and different disease sooner, especially since, in some ways, it was so clearly different from others (i.e. the patient knew before his/her companions). When, I wonder, will cures for dementia begin to appear, or more effective forms of treatment? It is up front with the most horrible illnesses today in all of its shapes and forms.

Resources:
Brody, Jane E. "A Thief that Robs the Brain of Language." The New York Times.
N.p., 2 May 2011. Web. 3 May 2011.

Stults, Michael G. "Dementia in Our Kids - The Uninvited Thief." Niemann-Pick
Children's Fund, Inc. N.p., 26 Mar. 2010. Web. 4 May 2011.
<
http://www.npcfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dementia-brain.jpg>.
Source for image.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

CSB #5: Swimming Eyeballs

Brachiopods, or "lamp shells," are, in effect, marine worms that live in shells. A long-standing scientific question has been whether or not they can see; recently, it seemed as though some dark spots on the larvae were light sensors. Under closer examination, it was revealed that they were primitive "eyes," or the model of eye that is a "swimming eyeball." Basically, this means that it could sense light or dark, but could not do much beyond that.
Above: brachiopods

This is the first step towards the evolution of an organ as complex as the eye. Darwin himself did not feel as though something like the eye, which is, at first glance, perfect, could be explained by his ground-breaking theory of evolution. However, he did come up with steps in the evolution of such an organ, and his theory had the backing of real, living organisms with that kind of eye. This is the really phenomenal part of the theory: there is incontestable
evidence for large parts of it. The first step of his theory in the evolution of the eye, though, was unsupported until the work with the brachiopods.

Scientists also checked to see if the photoreceptor, or light receiving, genes were active at any other stage of development. Surprisingly, more of the undeveloped embryos moved towards a light source than expected, the expected being that none would move. At this point, the brachiopod embryos have no brains, no eye-like organ, or anything.
Right: eye spots on brachiopod larva

It was absolutely fascinating that our eyes, such intricate, elaborate organs, could have started out as nothing more than a bunch of photoreceptor cells. Aside from this, the fact that the undeveloped embryos could sense light is truly unexpected. Scientists hypothesize that the yolk blocks light from some directions, and this allows the brachiopod-to-be to sense the light. How this would work is not exactly clear to me, especially if it has no neurons at all and can react to its environment. Not only can it sense the light, the embryo also moves towards it.

In regards to Darwin's theory of evolution, it seems even more fantastic because proof is still being sought for it, one of the most controversial theories. The new discoveries made today, confirming his ideas, show how truly ahead of his time he was and in what accurate detail he surmised about the development.

Resources:
Article:
Zimmer, Carl. "In a Marine Worm's Eyes, the Theory of Evolution." The New York
Times. N.p., 1 Mar. 2011. Web. 6 Mar. 2011. .

Picture:
http://www.treasuresofthesea.org.nz/uploads/images/147_image_main.jpg (brachiopod)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicyQ-gEozz_kvpVA6eIALX9_2ZGl6BMLwc1tvk2oj-ocTyXcHNNh9grpOtxnIFCd5Ke796tJqaHg431nhIDH9Gd_nroOFULRlQtDDA1TCdjImGIwGGX2BXaNh15NN-ThOCyPneW_LtsMw/s200/
BrachiopodLarva.jpg (larva)